FREQUENCY OF ELECTROACUPUNCTURE AS A CARDINAL FACTOR DETERMINING THE POTENCY OF ANALGESIA AND ITS VULNERABILITY TO NALOXONE BLOCKADE IN RABBITS
|更新时间:2023-08-11
|
FREQUENCY OF ELECTROACUPUNCTURE AS A CARDINAL FACTOR DETERMINING THE POTENCY OF ANALGESIA AND ITS VULNERABILITY TO NALOXONE BLOCKADE IN RABBITS
Acupuncture ResearchIssue 1, Pages: 56-60(1988)
作者机构:
1. 北京医科大学生理教研室
2. 北京医科大学生理教研室 大连医学院病理生理教研室
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:1988
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
FREQUENCY OF ELECTROACUPUNCTURE AS A CARDINAL FACTOR DETERMINING THE POTENCY OF ANALGESIA AND ITS VULNERABILITY TO NALOXONE BLOCKADE IN RABBITS[J]. Acupuncture research, 1988, (1): 56-60.
DOI:
FREQUENCY OF ELECTROACUPUNCTURE AS A CARDINAL FACTOR DETERMINING THE POTENCY OF ANALGESIA AND ITS VULNERABILITY TO NALOXONE BLOCKADE IN RABBITS[J]. Acupuncture research, 1988, (1): 56-60.DOI:
FREQUENCY OF ELECTROACUPUNCTURE AS A CARDINAL FACTOR DETERMINING THE POTENCY OF ANALGESIA AND ITS VULNERABILITY TO NALOXONE BLOCKADE IN RABBITS
电针刺激可使中枢神经系统释放阿片肽产生镇痛作用。但阿片颉颃剂纳洛酮阻断大鼠电针镇痛的程度和所需的剂量与电针频率密切相Male rabbits of 2 0-2.6kg were used. nociception was assessed by measuringthe latency of the escape response (ERL) elicited by strong radiant heat focused on the skin of the nostrils or on the tail. Electroacupunctre (EA) stimulationwas applied via acupuncture needles inserted into the acupoint Zusanli andQuenlun
located near the knee joint and ankle joint respectively
A 50% increasein ERL at the end of 10 min EA stimulation was considered as positive responsein EA analgesia. The effectivenese of EA analgesia was determined usingEA of different frequencies
ranging from 2
2—15
15
30
up to 60 and 100Hz with the intensify of EA being fixed at 2 volts (2.24±0.11mA). Thepercentage of responders was highest in 2-15 Hz EA (70%)
followed by 15Hz≥2 Hz>30Hz
whereas 60 and 100 Hz EA were practically ineffective(responders only 12--13%). The rate of responders as determined by nociceptivetest applie on the head showed no significant difference with those applied onthe tall
indicating that the analgesic effect is generalized rather than segmental.The vulnerability of EA analgesia to naloxone blockade depends on the frequencyof EA being used. The analgesic effect of 2 Hz & 2-15 Hz EA could be blockedby a small dosc (1mg/kg) of naloxone
that of 15 Hz EA by a higher dose(5mg/kg)
whereas the effect of 30 Hz HA could not be blocked even by 10mg/kg of naloxone. The results suggest that low frequency (2 Hz
2-15 Hz) EAanalgesia is mediated predominantly
and 15 Hz EA analgesia partly
by opioidmechanisms
whereas higher frequency (30 Hz or more) EA analgesia seems tobe mediated by non-opioid mechanisms.