浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 广州中医药大学第一临床医学院
2. 广州中医药大学第一附属医院针灸推拿康复二区
纸质出版日期:2019
移动端阅览
王嘉轩, 赵玮璇, 曾婧纯, 等. 火针为主治疗带状疱疹疼痛的系统评价和序贯分析[J]. 针刺研究, 2019,44(9):677-685.
WANG Jia-xuan, ZHAO Wei-xuan, ZENG Jing-chun, et al. Systematic review and sequential analysis on treatment of herpes zoster pain mainly by fire needle therapy[J]. Acupuncture research, 2019, 44(9): 677-685.
王嘉轩, 赵玮璇, 曾婧纯, 等. 火针为主治疗带状疱疹疼痛的系统评价和序贯分析[J]. 针刺研究, 2019,44(9):677-685. DOI: 10.13702/j.1000-0607.190004.
WANG Jia-xuan, ZHAO Wei-xuan, ZENG Jing-chun, et al. Systematic review and sequential analysis on treatment of herpes zoster pain mainly by fire needle therapy[J]. Acupuncture research, 2019, 44(9): 677-685. DOI: 10.13702/j.1000-0607.190004.
目的:系统评价火针为主治疗带状疱疹疼痛的疗效及安全性。方法:计算机检索中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、维普资讯中文期刊服务平台和中国生物医学文献服务系统、PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library数据库
按题目和摘要
检索以火针为主治疗带状疱疹的随机对照研究
应用RevMan5. 3. 5及TSA0. 9. 10 Beta对结局指标行Meta分析和试验序贯分析
运用GRADE profiler 3. 6. 1进行证据质量分级。结果:共纳入25项研究2 024例患者。定性分析结果提示
对比西药组
火针为主治疗带状疱疹疼痛有效率更高。Meta分析结果提示
与西药组比较
火针为主组治疗后VAS评分比西药组更低[WMD=-0. 96
95%CI(-1. 22
-0. 71)
P<0. 000 01]
疼痛缓解30%的时间更短[WMD=-1. 82
95%CI(-2. 46
-1. 18)
P<0. 000 01]
疼痛持续时间更短{火针联合电针[WMD=-11. 53
95%CI(-14. 57
-8. 48)
P<0. 000 01]、火针联合拔罐[WMD=-4. 75
95%CI(-7. 99
-1. 51)
P=0. 004]、单纯火针[WMD=-1. 82
95%CI(-2. 46
-1. 18)
P<0. 000 01]}
带状疱疹后遗神经痛发生率更低[RR=0. 16
95%CI(0. 09
0. 30)
P<0. 00001]。结论:火针为主治疗带状疱疹可明显降低治疗后VAS评分
缩短疼痛缓解30%的时间
缩短疼痛持续时间
降低后遗神经痛的发生率。
ObjectiveTo assess the therapeutic effect and safety of fire needle therapy in the treatment of herpes zoster pain.MethodsWe collected randomized controlled trials about treatment of herpes zoster pain mainly by fire needle therapy(published from the date of establishment of each database to Dec 1 of 2018)from databases of CNKI
Wanfang
VIP
Chinese Biomedical Document Service System(SinoMed)
PubMed
Embase
Cochrane Library by using key words of"fire needle""burnt needle""red-hot needle""herpes zoster""postherpetic neuralgia"and"herpetic neuralgia". Then
we conducted Meta-analysis and sequential analysis about the outcomes of studies met our inclusion criteria using RevMan5.3.5 and TSA0.9.10 Beta softwares and employed GRADE profiler 3.6.1 to grade the quality of evidence.ResultsA total of 25 studies including 2 024 patients were brought into the present analysis. Outcomes of the qualitative analysis indicated that the fire needle therapy has a higher effective rate than the western medicine group. Meta-analysis showed that after the treatment mainly with fire needle therapy
1)the VAS score is evidently lower[WMD=-0.96
95% CI(-1.22
-0.71)
P<0.000 01]
2)the duration of 30% pain relief is obviously shorter[WMD=-1.82
95% CI(-2.46
-1.18)
P<0.000 01]
3)the duration of pain is evidently shorter{fire needle combined with electroacupuncture[WMD=-11.53
95% CI(-14.57
-8.48)
P<0.000 01];fire needle combined with cupping[WMD=-4.75
95% CI(-7.99
-1.51)
P=0.004];pure fire needle therapy[WMD=-1.82
95% CI(-2.46
-1.18)
P<0.000 01]
and 4)the occurrence rate of post-herpetic neuralgia is considerably lower[RR=0.16
95% CI(0.09
0.30)
P<0.000 01]. The occurrence and management of adverse events were not mentioned in all the included studies
suggesting no safety problem of the therapy
but the publication bias has not been taken seriously.ConclusionIn the treatment of herpes zoster pain
fire needle as the main treatment approach can significantly relieve pain
shorten the pain duration
and reduce the incidence of post-herpetic neuralgia.
0
浏览量
1546
下载量
33
CNKI被引量
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构