浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 辽宁中医药大学针灸推拿学院
2. 沈阳市第七人民医院神经内科
3. 辽宁省中医院康复中心
纸质出版日期:2016
移动端阅览
王列, 马帅, 赵悦, 等. 温和灸激痛点治疗肩背部肌筋膜疼痛综合征:随机对照研究[J]. 针刺研究, 2016,41(4):334-337.
WANG Lie, MA Shuai, ZHAO Yue, et al. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial for Treatment of Shoulder-back Myofascial Pain Syndrome with Mild Moxibustion at Trigger Points[J]. Acupuncture research, 2016, 41(4): 334-337.
王列, 马帅, 赵悦, 等. 温和灸激痛点治疗肩背部肌筋膜疼痛综合征:随机对照研究[J]. 针刺研究, 2016,41(4):334-337. DOI: 10.13702/j.1000-0607.2016.04.009.
WANG Lie, MA Shuai, ZHAO Yue, et al. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial for Treatment of Shoulder-back Myofascial Pain Syndrome with Mild Moxibustion at Trigger Points[J]. Acupuncture research, 2016, 41(4): 334-337. DOI: 10.13702/j.1000-0607.2016.04.009.
目的:比较温和灸与针刺激痛点治疗肩背部肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)的疗效差异
为肩背部MPS的治疗提供参考。方法:60例肩背部MPS患者随机分为温和灸组和针刺组
每组30例
两组均选取疼痛部位的激痛点进行治疗。温和灸组采用温和灸疗法
每次艾灸因人而异
20
1
00min不等
以患者出现透热感为度;针刺组采用毫针与皮肤呈45°角斜刺入并贯穿激痛点结节
每次留针30min。两组每日均治疗1次
10次为一疗程
治疗1个疗程后
采用国际公认的简化麦吉尔疼痛量表(McGill)作为观察指标
以治疗前后疼痛分级指数(PRI)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)和现时疼痛强度(PPI)的变化来评价疗效。结果:温和灸组愈显率80.0%(24/30)
优于针刺组愈显率40.0%(12/30
P
<
0.001)。治疗后两组PRI、VAS、PPI评分较治疗前均降低(均P
<
0.001);两组治疗后PRI、VAS、PPI评分比较
差异均无统计学意义(均P
>
0.05)。结论:温和灸激痛点与针刺激痛点对肩背部MPS均具有良好的治疗效果
但温和灸治愈显效更为明显
且操作简便
易于推广。
Objective To compare the efficacy difference between the mild moxibustion and acupuncture stimulation at trigger points in the treatment of shoulder and back myofascial pain syndrome(MPS)
so as to provide a reference for clinical treatment of MPS.Methods A total of 60 patients with shoulder and back MPS were equally and randomly divided into mild moxibustion group and acupuncture group.The myofascial trigger points in the shoulder and back regions were stimulated with mild moxibustion for 20-100 min every time or punctured with filiform needles by retaining the needles for 30 min after twirling for a while.The treatment was conducted once daily for 10 days.The short-form McGill pain questionnaire(SF-MPQ)including the pain rating index[PRI consisting of 15descriptors(11sensory
4affective)which are rated on an intensity scale as 0=none
1=mild
2=moderate and 3=severe]
present pain intensity(PPI)index of the standard MPQ and a visual analogue scale(VAS)was used to assess the patient's pain severity before and after the treatment.Results Following the treatment
of the two 30 cases of MPS patients in the acupuncture and mild moxibustion groups
1and 7were cured
11 and 17experienced marked improvement
14 and 5were effective
4and 1was invalid
with the effective rates being 86.7%(26/30)and 96.7%(29/30)
respectively.The cured plus markedly effective rate of the mild moxibustion group was significantly better than that of the acupuncture group(P<0.001).Self-comparison of the two groups showed that the scores of PRI
VAS and PPI after the treatment were apparently reduced in both groups compared with pre-treatment(P<0.001)
but without significant differences between the two groups in the PRI
VAS and PPI scores after the treatment(P>0.05).Conclusion Mild moxibustion stimulation of myofascial trigger point is effective in relieving shoulder-back MPS
being comparable to that of acupuncture therapy.
0
浏览量
590
下载量
49
CNKI被引量
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构